noveldevice (
noveldevice) wrote2010-04-25 11:57 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
(no subject)
Ugh. I just watched a CNN segment that enraged me. I'm not going to link because I don't want to up their hits, but I have a few questions.
If someone asked you how many drinks in a sitting is a binge, what number would you give?
Now, would you ask them what they meant, specifically, by binge?
Would you ask them to define "a sitting"?
Would you ask them where that sitting would occur, how long it would last, and what the social context of that sitting would be?
If I ask you what is "a sitting" as it relates to a "binge", what is your response?
The CNN segment defined a "binge" as "5 drinks in a sitting". They didn't specify where that "sitting" was, how long the "sitting" was, or in what context it was occurring. There was also absolutely no adjustment for individual tolerance of alcohol. (Five ciders for me is about enough to get me lit, but if I don't keep drinking I'm sober again within an hour after I stop, and I won't have any ill effects the next morning, even if I don't drink water before bed. Five mixed drinks will have even less of an effect. Though either way, I will definitely want my coffee in the morning.)
Here's my irritation: The CNN segment is positing this as a faux-feminist ideological movement, and it makes me angry for two reasons. First, when you say "Third wave of feminism the potty-mouthed hard-drinking bad girl?", you ignore the fact that there is already a third wave of feminism out there. Second, I get really irritated when supposedly enlightened people clutch their pearls over women's behaviour, and then criticise it by saying that we're "acting like men". I'm sorry, what? If being female is intrinsically a bar to having fun, there is something hugely, hugely wrong with our society (not that that's news). I reject your attempts to impose "ladylike" behaviour on me. I will go on doing exactly what I want, and if you don't like it, fuck you.
That's just me being sensible, and feeling like I have the same rights as any other person regardless of plumbing. Which, come to think of it, is feminism.
If someone asked you how many drinks in a sitting is a binge, what number would you give?
Now, would you ask them what they meant, specifically, by binge?
Would you ask them to define "a sitting"?
Would you ask them where that sitting would occur, how long it would last, and what the social context of that sitting would be?
If I ask you what is "a sitting" as it relates to a "binge", what is your response?
The CNN segment defined a "binge" as "5 drinks in a sitting". They didn't specify where that "sitting" was, how long the "sitting" was, or in what context it was occurring. There was also absolutely no adjustment for individual tolerance of alcohol. (Five ciders for me is about enough to get me lit, but if I don't keep drinking I'm sober again within an hour after I stop, and I won't have any ill effects the next morning, even if I don't drink water before bed. Five mixed drinks will have even less of an effect. Though either way, I will definitely want my coffee in the morning.)
Here's my irritation: The CNN segment is positing this as a faux-feminist ideological movement, and it makes me angry for two reasons. First, when you say "Third wave of feminism the potty-mouthed hard-drinking bad girl?", you ignore the fact that there is already a third wave of feminism out there. Second, I get really irritated when supposedly enlightened people clutch their pearls over women's behaviour, and then criticise it by saying that we're "acting like men". I'm sorry, what? If being female is intrinsically a bar to having fun, there is something hugely, hugely wrong with our society (not that that's news). I reject your attempts to impose "ladylike" behaviour on me. I will go on doing exactly what I want, and if you don't like it, fuck you.
That's just me being sensible, and feeling like I have the same rights as any other person regardless of plumbing. Which, come to think of it, is feminism.
no subject
A bender, however, is when there's not enough drinking for passing out, but enough to prevent the person making it to the door unaided, that goes on for more than half a day.
no subject
"Have you had five drinks in a sitting" and "have you had four drinks in a row in an hour" are two very different questions.
no subject
Lame question is lame.
I'm reading a book right now about how poorly science is represented, and represents itself, to the public: how tempting it is to cite numbers as facts, when those numbers could very well be correct but not mean anything at all. It's depressing.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
If course, if a "sitting" means you don't get up to pee, I might have more sympathy for the definition.
Rate matters - so does effect.
As for the definition of binge, I thought the term implied an extended bout of drinking, with nasty consequences - ranging from raging headaches to missing an important engagement because you slept through it.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I mean, a couple years ago, there was one definition that was in use in Britain, for some purpose and I don't remember what -- but it basically said that a woman who had three beers in an evening, twice a week, was a problem drinker. The definition for men was also unreasonable, but not QUITE as unreasonable as the one for women.
I confess that my grumpy contrarian streak has led me to drink more in the last year or two. As I've been reading more and more definitions of "problem" and "binge" drinking that I think really SHOULDN'T be problems, I've been trying to bring my drinking up to those levels.
Okay, my other reason is that, as a mixologist and sommolier, I need to be creating cocktails, and tasting wines and beers frequently to keep my skills sharp, but still. Yes, primarily, I'm drinking more for professional reasons, but it's also because Stupid People Say I Shouldn't.
(Note: the "Stupid People" referred to here are rarely the researchers -- although it's happened. More frequently, they are news folks who are reporting poorly, and legislators who hear the poor news reporting and misunderstand even further.)
no subject